This blog is hosted on Ideas on EuropeIdeas on Europe Avatar

Latest

Better policy monitoring required to underpin decarbonisation

The United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP 25) is currently underway. The success of the Paris Agreement depends on the effective monitoring of climate policy measures. Political scientists at TU Darmstadt explain in a new study what it takes to achieve this.

The signatories of the 2015 Paris Agreement not only agreed to limit global warming to well below two degrees, but each country also put forward concrete measures to reduce greenhouse gases and secure financial support.

The EU member states report annually to the European Environment Agency EEA on current levels of greenhouse gas emissions and every two years on implemented and planned climate policies and measures. See Figure 1.

However, even after over 20 years of operation, standardised policy monitoring, which permits comparative conclusions across the European Union, has so far remained incomplete. In their new study, Schönefeld, Schulze and two international colleagues looked into the factors driving good monitoring and how the quality of the monitoring processes can be improved.

“At EU level we simply do not know enough about the impact of many climate policies and therefore struggle to identify the best measures”, explains Kai Schulze, Assistant Professor at the Institute for Housing and Environment (Institut Wohnen und Umwelt, IWU) and the Institute of Political Science (IfP) of TU Darmstadt.

The climate policy-based data submitted to the EEA are not only very heterogeneous, but also primarily contain estimates of expected future policy impacts, not actual policy impacts in the past. “There are simply not enough data to understand past policy impact,” notes Dr. Jonas Schönefeld, a Research Associate at the IfP.

Dr. Jonas Schönefeld (left) and Prof. Kai Schulze

Their findings demonstrate that EU members with higher overall public spending report in a timelier fashion than countries with a smaller public budgets. By contrast, countries including Denmark, the United Kingdom and Germany, which were at the forefront of monitoring and evaluating their climate policies ten years ago, still remain ahead today. At the same time, there are significant learning effects in policy monitoring across the countries, evidenced by greater levels of quantification.

“In other words, climate policy monitoring systems are improving,” stresses Schönefeld. However, time is of essence in relation to decarbonisation. In order to rapidly improve the monitoring systems and in particular the collection of data on past policy impacts, the study suggests that the European Commission and the EEA need to provide technical support and raise greater awareness among the member states that monitoring needs to be a higher political priority. Schönefeld explains: “Monitoring systems require resources, reliable institutional frameworks and committed political stakeholders.”

More Information:

The study “Policy Monitoring in the EU: The Impact of Institutions, Implementation and Quality” relies on quantitative regression models and qualitative interviews. It was co-funded by the Federal Ministry of Science and Research as part of the Kopernikus project ENavi (funding code: 03SFK4P0) and is published in a new special issue of German Political Science Quarterly.

Aside from TU Darmstadt, the research team also involved colleagues from the Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research at the School of Environmental Sciences of the University of East Anglia UEA and the Finnish Environment Institute SYKE.

Photo credit: Katrin Binner

This post was originally published as a press release here.

Comments Off on Better policy monitoring required to underpin decarbonisation

Recent Articles

Is The Paris Agreement on Shaky Legs? How to Ensure Successful Implementation

Published on by and | Comments Off on Is The Paris Agreement on Shaky Legs? How to Ensure Successful Implementation

What is needed to make the Paris Agreement a success? This blog post focuses on one of the most central but underappreciated elements – the periodic reviews of progress.  States must of course make ambitious and credible contributions in the first place.  But if there is no system to ensure that they are monitored and […]

The politics of (bad) policy design: French solar panels and Northern Irish boilers

Published on by | Comments Off on The politics of (bad) policy design: French solar panels and Northern Irish boilers

As one previous post on this blog detailed, the current political turmoil in Northern Ireland was sparked by a subsidy for renewable energy production.  Though it is tempting to blame political carelessness, the ongoing RHI scandal prompts a broader reflection about renewable energy policy instruments. Incentives akin to the RHI are relatively common in renewable […]

Too hot to handle? The Renewable Heat Incentive scheme & the Northern Irish meltdown

Published on by | Comments Off on Too hot to handle? The Renewable Heat Incentive scheme & the Northern Irish meltdown

Since December, Northern Ireland has been bogged down in a major scandal on an apparently simple policy instrument – the renewable heat incentive scheme. The scheme, closed in early 2016, was set up in 2012 to encourage renewable heat uptake. Since then, it has generated a massive overspend (more than £1bn UK public money, £600 […]

Nature Directives ‘Fit for Purpose’: a turning point for EU policy dismantling?

Published on by | Comments Off on Nature Directives ‘Fit for Purpose’: a turning point for EU policy dismantling?

The 28 EU Commissioners met today to decide the fate of the EU’s Nature Directives (the 1979 Birds Directive and 1992 Habitats Directive). Would these two directives, the cornerstone of EU biodiversity legislation, be deemed ‘fit for purpose’ or would they be revised and potentially weakened? After years of internal debates within the European Commission, […]

Lessons from European Climate Monitoring Crucial for Paris Agreement Success

Published on by , and | Comments Off on Lessons from European Climate Monitoring Crucial for Paris Agreement Success

As the 22nd session of the Conference of the Parties (COP 22) in Marrakech draws to a close, it is becoming increasingly clear that credible monitoring and transparency procedures are urgently needed. Otherwise national pledges to address climate change in the spirit of the 2015 Paris Agreement will not build sufficient global trust. The 2015 […]

Donald Trump v. The Environment: learning from past attempts to dismantle environmental policy

Published on by | Comments Off on Donald Trump v. The Environment: learning from past attempts to dismantle environmental policy

A week after the Paris Agreement entered into force, the United States have elected Donald J. Trump as their 45th President – a man who famously described climate change as “created by and for the Chinese in order to make U.S. manufacturing non-competitive.” His stance on climate change, his strong support for coal and pledge […]

Heathrow expansion in the shadow of Brexit

Published on by | Comments Off on Heathrow expansion in the shadow of Brexit

After decades of debate on where – and whether – to expand airport capacity in south-eastern England, the UK government announced two days ago that it would favour building a third runway at Heathrow Airport. This option, highly criticised on environmental grounds (notably due to the air pollution caused by road transport to the airport) […]

Can European policies be dismantled?

Published on by and | Comments Off on Can European policies be dismantled?

A recent Pew Research Center poll found that 42 per cent of Europeans were keen for some ‘powers’ to be returned to the national level, with only 19 per cent favouring further centralisation at EU level. The idea of ‘less Europe’ is not new: calls for it date back to the great subsidiarity debate of […]

What a difference a vote makes? Second guessing British-EU environmental policy interactions after Brexit.

Published on by | Comments Off on What a difference a vote makes? Second guessing British-EU environmental policy interactions after Brexit.

Since Britain voted to leave the EU are we any wiser what it all means? Uncertainty seems the safest prediction for now. Yet given that Britain has played an important role in EU environmental policy, we need to try to make some sense of it. Towards a more German style EU environmental policy? In the […]

How the UK can still lead on climate change – even after Brexit

Published on by and | Comments Off on How the UK can still lead on climate change – even after Brexit

In the wake of the Brexit earthquake, experts are sifting through the rubble, assessing the damage, and checking the stability of remaining structures. Advocates of ambitious climate policy have been particularly active. Since the late 1990s, the UK has been a leader on climate change, both domestically, within the European Union, and through its active […]

  • Pages

  • Categories

  • Recent Posts

  • Recent Comments

  • Archives

  • UACES and Ideas on Europe do not take responsibility for opinions expressed in articles on blogs hosted on Ideas on Europe. All opinions are those of the contributing authors.